Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1820 vs FX-6300

Celeron G1820 vs FX-6300: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than FX-6300.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820

  • Performs up to 0% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-6300 - 452 vs 451 FPS
  • Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD FX-6300

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of DOOM Eternal.
DOOM Eternal

DOOM Eternal

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Nightmare

Intel Celeron G1820 Logo
Celeron G1820

Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013


FPS

452

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

FPS Winner

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

451

99%

Value, €/FPS

€0.09/FPS

100%

Price, €

€38.99

100%

Value Winner

CPU AMD FX-6300, Socket AM3+, 4 core, 6MB di cache, 3.3GHz, 32nm, 95W TDP

Buy for 38.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 180 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Nightmare

Intel Celeron G1820 Logo
Celeron G1820

Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1820 Logo
Celeron G1820

Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013


Single-Core

491

100%

Multi-Core

825

56%

AMD FX-6300 Logo
FX-6300

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

463

94%

Multi-Core

1453

100%

Intel Celeron G1820 Logo

Intel Celeron G1820

vs
AMD FX-6300 Logo

AMD FX-6300

Dec 1st, 2013
Release DateOct 23rd, 2012
CeleronCollectionFX
HaswellCodenameVishera
Intel Socket 1150SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
6
2Threads
6
2.7 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.5 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.1 GHz
53 W
TDP95 W
22 nm
Process Size32 nm
27.0x
Multiplier17.5x
Intel HD (Haswell)
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.