Key Differences
In short — Pentium G640 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G640 is 183 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1620 - 157 vs 156 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium G640
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
92.11711711711712%
Multi-Core
723
96.39999999999999%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
