Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1620 vs Core i9-13900

Celeron G1620 vs Core i9-13900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 539.09 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76581 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-13900

2.0 GHz | 24-core

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 539.09 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76581 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1620.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620

  • Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 55 vs 65 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900

  • Performs up to 16% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1620 - 147 vs 127 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of The Last of Us Part I.
The Last of Us Part I

The Last of Us Part I

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

127

86.39455782312925%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

147

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€539.09

100%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-13900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz

Buy for 539.09 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 76581 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

409

15.070007369196759%

Multi-Core

723

4.401558504809448%

Intel Core i9-13900 Logo
Core i9-13900

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2714

100%

Multi-Core

16426

100%

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo

Intel Celeron G1620

vs
Intel Core i9-13900 Logo

Intel Core i9-13900

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
CeleronCollectionCore i9
Ivy BridgeCodenameRaptor Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
24
2Threads
32
2.7 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.0 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.6 GHz
55 W
TDP65 W
22 nmProcess Size
10 nm
27.0x
Multiplier20.0x
Intel HDIntegrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Celeron G1620 or Core i9-13900

The Last of Us Part I, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.