Buy on Amazon
€349.59
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2793 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 153% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G1620 - 225 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-10850K - Processore desktop 10 fino a 5,2 GHz sbloccato LGA1200 (chipset Intel serie 400) 125 W
Buy for €349.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76354 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i9-10850K
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
23.50574712643678%
Multi-Core
723
7.9485488126649075%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
