Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-875K is 918 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 2% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G1620 - 258 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
80.35363457760315%
Multi-Core
723
41.05621805792163%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
