Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 181 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 29% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1620 - 165 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
35.53431798436142%
Multi-Core
723
22.218807621389058%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
