Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 3053 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 5300G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1620 - 246 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
23.820617355853233%
Multi-Core
723
13.188617292958774%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
