Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2705 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610T - 276 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €143.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |