Buy on Amazon
€560.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $449
Availability
MSRP in USD: $449
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1610T - 233 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 16 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
233
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€560.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Processore Ryzen 7 7800X3D, Tecnologia 3D VCache, 8 Core/16 Thread senza Limiti, Architettura Zen 4, 104 M di Cache, 120 W di TDP, AMD Socket 5, DDR5 e PCIe 5.0
Buy for €560.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
PC Builds Using Celeron G1610T or Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order, 1920 x 1080, Epic
145 FPS
€13.65/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,979
In Stock
160 FPS
€12.18/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,949
In Stock
160 FPS
€13.12/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,099.99
In Stock
168 FPS
€12.97/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,179
In Stock
194 FPS
€12.37/FPS
GeForce RTX 4080
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,399
In Stock
185 FPS
€12.43/FPS
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,299.99
In Stock
176 FPS
€12.5/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,199.99
In Stock
145 FPS
€20.26/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€2,937.47
In Stock
204 FPS
€11.17/FPS
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,279
In Stock
168 FPS
€13.68/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
64 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,299
In Stock
160 FPS
€12.49/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,999
In Stock
194 FPS
€11.32/FPS
GeForce RTX 4080
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
16 GB, 1.953125 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€2,196.15
In Stock
204 FPS
€11.17/FPS
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,279
In Stock
155 FPS
€11.61/FPS
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,799
In Stock
185 FPS
€10.81/FPS
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€1,999
In Stock
194 FPS
€12.11/FPS
GeForce RTX 4080
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,349
In Stock
233 FPS
€14.59/FPS
GeForce RTX 4090
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€3,399
In Stock
160 FPS
€13.12/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,099.99
In Stock
176 FPS
€13.07/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€2,299.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
