Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610T vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Celeron G1610T vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

4.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
AMD Processore Ryzen 7 7800X3D, Tecnologia 3D VCache, 8 Core/16 Thread senza Limiti, Architettura Zen 4, 104 M di Cache, 120 W di TDP, AMD Socket 5, DDR5 e PCIe 5.0

Buy for 355 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 122 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

4.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
AMD Processore Ryzen 7 7800X3D, Tecnologia 3D VCache, 8 Core/16 Thread senza Limiti, Architettura Zen 4, 104 M di Cache, 120 W di TDP, AMD Socket 5, DDR5 e PCIe 5.0

Buy for 355 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 122 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1610T.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T

  • Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

  • Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1610T - 479 vs 365 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 16 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Battlefield IV.
Battlefield IV

Battlefield IV

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

365

76%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

479

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.74/FPS

100%

Price, €

€355

100%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD Processore Ryzen 7 7800X3D, Tecnologia 3D VCache, 8 Core/16 Thread senza Limiti, Architettura Zen 4, 104 M di Cache, 120 W di TDP, AMD Socket 5, DDR5 e PCIe 5.0

Buy for 355 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 122 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

338

12%

Multi-Core

594

3%

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2719

100%

Multi-Core

15172

100%

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo

Intel Celeron G1610T

vs
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
CeleronCollectionRyzen 7
Ivy BridgeCodenameRaphael
Intel Socket 1155SocketAMD Socket AM5
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
2Threads
16
2.3 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.0 GHz
35 W
TDP120 W
22 nmProcess Size
5 nm
23.0xMultiplier
42.0x
Intel HDIntegrated GraphicsRadeon Graphics
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Celeron G1610T or Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Battlefield IV, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.