Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2548 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610 - 273 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 64 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.03911980440098%
Multi-Core
739
5.275556824671616%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
