Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3118 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 31% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron B830 - 192 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €290.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13896 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |