Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 601 days older than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Celeron B830 - 139 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€414.81
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €414.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |