Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3839 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 43% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron B820 - 137 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€569.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €569.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |