Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1800X outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1800X is 1705 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1800X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
- Performs up to 34% better in War Thunder than Celeron B820 - 164 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 16 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€342.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €342.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1800X |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |