Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1852 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Celeron B820 - 225 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €140.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |