Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3922 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Dead Space than Celeron B815 - 167 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |