Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800H is 3299 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Performs up to 132% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron B815 - 186 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 5800H
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800H |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
