Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 2266 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 17 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 847 - 174 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 32 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i9-7960X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
