Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10750H outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10750H is 3210 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-10750H - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than Celeron 847 - 718 vs 662 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-10750H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-10750H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
