Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 161 days older than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron 847 - 116 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |