Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 735 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron 3865U - 234 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 6 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |