Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 978 days older than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 15 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 38% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron 3865U - 314 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
314
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |