Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 1512 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron 3205U - 155 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |