Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 674 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 15 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 12% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron 3205U - 214 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €44.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13864 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |