Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1129 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 15 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron 3205U - 251 vs 250 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
