Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1502 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron 1037U - 108 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 16 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |