Key Differences
In short — Core i7-870 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-870 is 1230 days older than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Performs up to 3% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron 1007U - 152 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 8 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |