Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3271 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 30% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron 1000M - 232 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €160.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |