Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1915 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 38% better in War Thunder than Celeron 1000M - 170 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |