Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3395 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of FX-9590
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €174.94 vs €365.83
- Up to 24% better value when playing New World than Core i7-13700K - €1.77 vs €2.33 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 59% better in New World than FX-9590 - 157 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €174.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.33/FPS
76%
Price, €
€365.83
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €365.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9590 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |