The FX-9590 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-7100T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €68.26 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-7100T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 39% cheaper – €106.68 vs €174.94
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 35 vs 220 Watts
FX-9590 vs Core i3-7100T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€106.68
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
FX-9590 vs Core i3-7100T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9590 vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9590 vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-9590 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
