Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of FX-8350
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €285.00 vs €471.07
- Up to 36% better value when playing Control than Core i9-14900K - €1.43 vs €2.25 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than FX-8350 - 209 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
64%
Price, €
€471.07
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7383 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8350 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |