The FX-8320E is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
FX-8320E vs Core i9-13900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, €
€550
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.48/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Core i9-13900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
