The FX-8320E is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-10900KF cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-10900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
FX-8320E vs Core i9-10900KF for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
€410.13
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Core i9-10900KF in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $509.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
