The FX-8320E is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4820K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-4820K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
FX-8320E vs Core i7-4820K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8320E vs Core i7-4820K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-4820K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-4820K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4820K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
95 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
