FX-8320E vs Core i5-9600 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The FX-8320E is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-9600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-9600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
206
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-9600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-9600 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
89%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i5-9600
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
