In Battlefield 6, the FX-8150 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5700G. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $134 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 72% cheaper – $51.29 vs $185.29
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.84 vs $1.93/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Battlefield 6
Ryzen 7 5700G
- Up to 57% faster in Battlefield 6 – 96 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 57% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Apr 13, 2021 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 7 5700G: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
61 FPS
64%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
64%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 5700G
Apr 13th, 2021
Average FPS
96 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
100%
Price, $
$185.29
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
44%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 7 5700G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 7 5700G in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700G
Apr 13th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700G Apr 13th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
