Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 3262 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 127 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6350 | vs | Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |