Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 6900HX outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 6900HX is 3366 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than FX-6300 - 539 vs 491 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Mobile • Jan 10th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 10th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rembrandt |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP7 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 6 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
