Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4102 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of FX-6100
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in Elden Ring than FX-6100 - 137 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€673.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €673.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8939 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6100 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |