In Battlefield 6, the FX-4350 is much slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $370 cheaper!
FX-4350
- Up to 82% cheaper – $82.71 vs $452.68
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 59% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.35 vs $3.32/FPS
- Up to 59% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 123% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 123% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-4350 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
45%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
45%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
18%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
41%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4350 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4350 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
