FX-4300 vs Core i9-9940X in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The FX-4300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9940X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 95 vs 165 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-9940X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 28 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-9940X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4300 vs Core i9-9940X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
4 MB
21%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-4300 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9940X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
$122.00 | MSRP | $1,387.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
