The FX-4130 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-4130
The Core i9-13900 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
FX-4130 vs Core i9-13900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€494.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.3/FPS
100%
FX-4130 vs Core i9-13900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$112.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
