Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms EPYC 9354P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 924 days older than EPYC 9354P.
Advantages of EPYC 9354P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in New World than EPYC 9354P - 123 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 9354P - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9354P doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€306.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €306.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9354P | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |