Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms EPYC 9354P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 371 days older than EPYC 9354P.
Advantages of EPYC 9354P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than EPYC 9354P - 688 vs 558 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 9354P - 125 vs 280 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
688
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€169.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €169.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9354P | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |