Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms EPYC 9174F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 44 days older than EPYC 9174F.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than EPYC 9174F - 202 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 170 vs 320 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9174F doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€367.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €367.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7247 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
320 W | TDP | 170 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |