Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 820 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than EPYC 7742 - 321 vs 312 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 125 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7742 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |