Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms EPYC 7642 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 820 days newer than EPYC 7642.
Advantages of EPYC 7642
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 96 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than EPYC 7642 - 694 vs 541 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7642 - 125 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7642 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7642
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-12600K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7642 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
48 | Cores | 10 |
96 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
