Key Differences
In short — EPYC 75F3 outperforms Ryzen 5 5600GT on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 75F3 is 1029 days older than Ryzen 5 5600GT.
Advantages of EPYC 75F3
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 5600GT - 210 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 75F3
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 75F3 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Not Available | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
