The EPYC 7542 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7542
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 65 vs 225 Watts
EPYC 7542 vs Core i3-10105F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7542
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
96%
Min 1% FPS
120
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€85.5
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
EPYC 7542 vs Core i3-10105F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7542 vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7542 vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7542
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
12%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7542 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $97.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Rome | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
